When an employee is hired during a period of leadership transition and organizational shift, the situation can often lead to uncertainty and lack of direction for the new hire. This scenario is particularly challenging in municipal management, where roles and responsibilities are closely tied to regulatory and community expectations. The timing of the hire might result in the employee being in a state of limbo for months, without proper supervision or performance monitoring. Addressing this issue effectively requires a proactive and transparent approach.
First and foremost, it is crucial to communicate openly with the employee about the ongoing changes within the organization. Employees appreciate transparency and it helps in building trust. A study by Men, L.R. (2014) highlights that transparent communication is significantly related to employee engagement. Informing the employee about the leadership changes and what that might mean for their role and responsibilities can alleviate uncertainty and anxiety.
Reinterviewing the employee is another strategic approach to consider. This does not mean questioning their qualifications again but rather discussing their fit and function in the evolving organizational structure. This process allows both the employer and the employee to reassess and realign expectations and objectives. According to a research by Cable, D.M., and Kay, V.S. (2012), person-organization fit is crucial for organizational commitment and job satisfaction. This fit becomes even more critical during periods of transition.
Implementing a probationary period as part of the reinterviewing process can also be beneficial. This period would not only allow the employee to demonstrate their capabilities in the new context but also give management time to evaluate the employee’s performance accurately. A probationary period can serve as a practical framework for performance monitoring, which is essential given that the initial hiring phase coincided with a leadership vacuum. Research by Allen, D.G. (2006) supports the idea that structured onboarding processes, including probationary periods, enhance employee retention and performance.
During this probationary period, it is vital to provide the employee with clear goals and regular feedback. Feedback plays a transformative role in employee performance, particularly in times of organizational change. As noted by London, M. (2003), continuous feedback helps employees adjust to new roles and expectations more effectively. Regular meetings should be scheduled to discuss progress and address any concerns the employee might have. This ongoing dialogue ensures that the employee does not feel isolated or overlooked during the transition.
Furthermore, offering support and resources is essential. Employees undergoing a transition within a shifting organizational structure might require additional training or mentoring to adapt to new systems or leadership styles. Providing these resources demonstrates the organization’s commitment to employee development and well-being. A study by Kozlowski, S.W.J., and Ilgen, D.R. (2006) emphasizes the importance of adaptive training and support systems in enhancing employee performance in dynamic environments.
Lastly, it is important to foster a culture of inclusion and involvement. Engaging the employee in decision-making processes and team activities can help integrate them into the organizational culture. This involvement can also provide insights into their capabilities and how they collaborate with others. As argued by Shore, L.M., et al. (2011), inclusive practices lead to better job performance and higher job satisfaction.
Addressing the challenges faced by employees hired during organizational transitions requires a multifaceted approach. By being transparent, reassessing employee fit, implementing a probationary period, providing regular feedback, offering support, and promoting inclusion, municipal management can effectively manage these complex situations. These strategies not only support the employee in question but also enhance overall organizational resilience and adaptability.
Ai assisted article- Original Insights
Photo by Ryota Nagasaka via Upsplash
References:
Allen, D.G. "Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover?" Journal of Management 32, no. 2 (2006): 237-256.
Cable, D.M., and Kay, V.S. "Striving for self-verification during organizational entry." Academy of Management Journal 55, no. 2 (2012): 360-380.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., and Ilgen, D.R. "Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7, no. 3 (2006): 77-124.
London, M. "Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement." Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2003.
Men, L.R. "The effects of organizational leadership on strategic internal communication and employee outcomes." Journal of Public Relations Research 26, no. 5 (2014): 462-481.
Shore, L.M., et al. "Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research." Journal of Management 37, no. 4 (2011): 1262-1289.