Shadows and Secrets: Navigating the Minds of Pedophiles

Shadows and Secrets: Navigating the Minds of Pedophiles

D
Damon Gergar
1 min read

With over a decade dedicated to investigating crimes against children, I have interviewed, investigated, and either arrested or assisted in the arrest of more pedophiles than I can recall. From these interactions, I have learned that obtaining confessions from such individuals often has a high likelihood of success. Many of these perpetrators seem to find a sense of relief in confessing and sharing secrets they have never disclosed to anyone else. This observation aligns with psychological theories on guilt and confession, which suggest that confession can provide relief from the stress of guilt.

Most child sexual abuse material offenders I have dealt with possessed images and videos of very young children, typically between the ages of 0 and 10. These materials were not only possessed but often disseminated globally through social media, the dark web, messaging apps, peer-to-peer file-sharing sites, and through the mail. The most heinous cases involved creators of such content, often victimizing children they knew personally—frequently within their own families or circle of friends. This disturbing fact highlights the pervasive and deeply personal nature of these crimes.

Early in my career, I adopted an interview technique that involved minimization, rationalization, and projection. This approach, discussed in an FBI law enforcement bulletin, involves downplaying the severity of the crime, offering seemingly understandable reasons for the perpetrator's actions, and shifting blame to external factors like family dynamics or societal conditions. While these tactics were instrumental in obtaining confessions, they required navigating ethical boundaries, as they involved a degree of deception.

Another critical aspect of my interviews was probing for undisclosed crimes. Often, I would falsely inform the suspect that other children in their lives were currently being interviewed by colleagues and divulging information. I would tell my suspect that this was their chance to tell the complete truth and that if any other crimes were uncovered later, it would not bode well for them from a legal standpoint. This strategy frequently led to confessions of additional offenses, such as rape, sexual abuse, and the production of child sexual abuse material—crimes that might not have been uncovered otherwise. While effective, such tactics are controversial and not permissible in all jurisdictions due to legal and ethical standards.

Building rapport was another essential element of my approach. Being kind, offering snacks like chips or soft drinks, and discussing neutral topics like sports helped establish trust. I would always play the “nice guy” and do my best to appear sympathetic to their ordeal. This approach is supported by research indicating that rapport-building can significantly enhance the likelihood of obtaining truthful disclosures during interviews.

Gaining access to a suspect’s email account, messaging apps, social media accounts, and phone applications was crucial. After obtaining their confession, I would ask if I could use their identity and online personas to interact with others they had been communicating with or sharing illicit material with. By assuming their online identities, I could infiltrate networks of offenders, leading to additional arrests and the rescue of victims. This method highlights the importance of being proactive—taking cases a step further and expanding them to potentially identify more child predators or victims.

It was also vital to manage the emotions and actions of the investigative team. Ensuring that team members treated suspects with professionalism and refrained from prejudicial behavior was crucial for maintaining the integrity of the investigation and ensuring admissible confessions. It was understandable that officers who were not accustomed to these types of investigations might feel anger or hostility toward those who actively harm children. However, such emotions could spill over during the execution of a search warrant or the arrest process. I frequently emphasized to my colleagues the importance of remaining as calm and professional as possible, as doing so increased my chances of securing a confession or uncovering additional crimes during the interview.

Most interviews with these offenders occurred during the execution of a search warrant. I found that interviewing suspects in a familiar environment, like their bedroom (after ensuring the area was safe from weapons), and making them aware of their rights often facilitated more open communication. The importance of recording these interactions cannot be overstated, although it is not always legally required.

Finally, follow-up interviews with the suspect later in the day were critical. At this stage, I would often reveal that additional information had been uncovered (even if no new evidence had actually been found), providing them with one last opportunity to disclose further offenses. This step was crucial for strengthening the case and ensuring all potential leads were pursued. Throughout these interactions, maintaining a demeanor of kindness and professionalism was paramount—not only for ethical reasons but also as a strategic tool in the investigation. Surprisingly, it was not uncommon for suspects to express gratitude for the respectful treatment they received, despite the circumstances. Many even thanked me when all was said and done.

Assisted by AI

Photo by Stefano Pollio on Unsplash


These experiences highlight the complex interplay of psychological manipulation, ethical considerations, and legal boundaries in the interrogation of child sex offenders. They emphasize the necessity for ongoing training and discussion among law enforcement professionals to navigate these challenges effectively and ethically.

  • FBI. "Interviewing Techniques in Domestic Violence Cases, One Size Does Not Fit All." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1992.

  • Feld, Barry C. "Police Interrogation of Juveniles: An Empirical Study of Policy and Practice." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 97, no. 1 (2006): 219-316.

  • Holmberg, Ulf, and Sven Å Christianson. "Murderers' and Sexual Offenders' Experiences of Police Interviews and Their Inclination to Admit or Deny Crimes." Behavioural Sciences & the Law 20, no. 1-2 (2002): 31-45.

  • Kassin, Saul M., and Gísli H. Gudjonsson. "The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5, no. 2 (2004): 33-67.

  • Krone, Tony. "A Typology of Online Child Pornography Offending." Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 279 (2005): 1-6.

  • Leo, Richard A. "Inside the Interrogation Room." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 86, no. 2 (1996): 266-303.

  • Vallano, Jonathan P., and Nadja Schreiber Compo. "A Comfortable Witness Is a Good Witness: Rapport-Building and Susceptibility to Misinformation in an Investigative Mock-Crime Interview." Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, no. 6 (2011): 960-970.